Disclaimer: We sometimes use affiliate links in our content. For more information, visit our Disclaimer Page.
Editpad & Quillbot are two competitors—so which one is better at paraphrasing?
AI paraphrasing is one of the pillars of modern writing. Whether it’s an SEO blog or a school essay, writers need paraphrasing with the help of quality tools. So, when you look for such paraphrasers, Editpad and Quillbot stand out as two options.
But which one of them is better? Moreover, which one of them has better AI paraphrasing? In this article, we’ll answer these questions and more. So, let’s get to compare.
What is Editpad?
Editpad is one of the leading platforms today, and it’s used equally by both professionals and students. One of the major reasons behind that is its ability to paraphrase quality content in no time. And it offers an extensive word limit as well.
However, another reason behind Editpad’s success is its variety of quality tools. Besides paraphrasing, it primarily acts as an online editor—both simple and rich text. And it offers a plagiarism checker, which usually goes hand-in-hand with the paraphrasing tool.
This plays a major role in its success among SEO writers, academic writers, and students. However, the top player by Editpad is still the AI paraphrasing tool. Here’s what it offers:
- Four AI based content modes—two of which are completely free;
- Up to 17 languages supported;
- Easy upload method;
- Quick and efficient paraphrasing;
- A generous 1000-word limit.
For a free tool to offer 1000-words or more is always a blessing, and Editpad caters to its audience by standing out as a premium tool, despite being free.
While it offers premium packages, it doesn’t hold back quality until you pay. That’s why it’s widely considered one of the best paraphrasing tools today.
What is Quillbot?
Quillbot is one of the most renowned tools among writers. It has become a leading choice for writers, whether they are professionals or students. This tool’s primary purpose is to remove plagiarism or alter its content for better flow.
That’s one of the major reasons it’s used extensively by students more than it is used by professionals. While there are questions about the quality, there’s no denying its fame. One of the main reasons behind quality questions is the robotic tone—in which the tool often rephrases your content.
Hence, it’s not a popular choice among writers in higher education or professional writing. But still, as a paraphrasing tool, it offers a variety of options, such as:
- Synonym intensity;
- Two free content modes;
- Google Chrome and MS Word extensions;
- A meager 125-word limit.
The word limit also happens to be one of the downsides, as it only allows a few paragraphs to be rephrased at once. Hence, it saves the best features and abilities for the paid version.
Leading Factors: Editpad vs. Quillbot
Before we compare their paraphrasing, it’s imperative to put them head to head in comparison. So, to give you a better idea of which tool looks better in theory, here’s a table:
|Two free content modes||Content Modes||Four/Two are free|
|No||Free Plagiarism Checker*||Yes|
|English variants only||Supported Languages||Up to 17|
As you can see, in their various offerings, Editpad leads the way as a better free option. For a tool to offer this many features without costing you a penny is a lifesaver for many students and writers. Hence, its popularity has spiked in recent times.
AI Paraphrasing With Quillbot and Editpad
Now those intricacies are out of the way, let’s compare the paraphrasing quality of both these tools. Since Quillbot offers a lot less in terms of word limit, we’ll only paraphrase a 100-words or so. So, let’s get started.
- Quillbot’s AI Paraphrasing
Quillbot focuses on changing and altering the synonyms. That’s something indicated by its synonym intensity selector, which you can crank up to 60-70% in the free version. Anything above that is available only in premium.
However, when you paraphrase using the default settings, there’s a major issue with that. Have a look:
On the surface, it looks like just another paraphrasing job, with a few words rephrased here and there. However, if you look closely, it’s not altering the voice, tone, or sentence flow. It’s only replacing words with alternative synonyms. What’s the issue with that? Here’s what:
- It won’t’ exactly remove plagiarism;
- It’s exactly what causes the robotic content tone;
- It’ll cause patchwork plagiarism in your content.
Hence, this type of paraphrasing will cause you more issues than benefits. And that’s why Quillbot’s free version isn’t up to the mark in AI paraphrasing.
- Editpad’s AI Paraphrasing
Now it’s Editpad’s turn, and we’ll also try the same paragraph with this tool. Editpad is known to have two free content modes, but to keep things fair, we’ll also use the default one here. Here’s what it looks like:
And right away, the AI paraphrasing with Editpad looks a lot better than it did with Quillbot. Here you can find a few things, such as:
- It’s not only replacing words with synonyms;
- It’s actually altering the sentence’s flow;
- It changes the sentence’s pattern;
- It changed the content voice.
These factors make it a better alternative to Quillbot; as you can clearly see, it has a lot more paraphrasing integrity. And once again, it can do all this to a 1000-word, for free.
Conclusion: Which AI Paraphrasing is better?
The answer is clear, folks; Editpad wins this battle due to its comprehensive paraphrasing and other tools. The free avalaibility is just too good for Quillbot to even come close. Once again, Quillbot’s premium services aren’t in question here, so we don’t know about that.
However, the free version of Quillbot is subpar and doesn’t even come close to the quality and integrity offered by Editpad’s paraphraser. Hence, it wins this race clearly.