Build and Scale Your Own SaaS Business
Launch your own branded SaaS effortlessly and create recurring revenue.
Learn MoreAutomate Your SEO for Faster Results
AI-powered platform for automated audits, competitor analysis, and content optimization.
Learn MoreDisclaimer: We sometimes use affiliate links in our content. For more information, visit our Disclaimer Page.
Schachter’s singer theory is a social psychology theory. It was developed by Stanley Schachter and Jerome Singer in the 1950s.
The basic premise of Schachter’s singer theory is that humans must maintain consistency between their beliefs and behaviors when there is any inconsistency between these two things. It creates psychological tension or dissonance.
In this article, we’ll look at the two-factor theory of emotion with an example. We’ll also go through a few additional ideas related to this topic.
Note: Schachter-singer’s theory is also called the two-factor theory of emotion.
Overview
The Schachter-Singer theory of emotion states that emotions are the result of two factors: physiological processes and cognitive processes.
- Physiological processes refer to the changes in the body when we experience an emotion, which researchers refer to as “physiological arousal.” These changes can include increased heart rate, sweating, and trembling.
- Cognitive processes refer to the way we interpret these physiological changes. For example, we try to understand our emotions by looking at the situation or event that may be causing them.
This theory helps us understand how our emotions are created and how they can be managed.
What is Schachter-singer’s theory of emotion?
The Schachter-Singer theory is a psychological theory that states that two factors contribute to emotional experience. These two factors are cognitive labeling and inadequately explained physiological arousal.
Cognitive labeling refers to the process of attaching meaning to the physical sensations of arousal.
And physiological arousal is associated with the experience of emotion. For example, increased heart rate and sweating are both common anxiety symptoms. But, it is not always clear why some people experience emotions more than others.
As a result, they may be more likely to experience intense emotional reactions. Still, this theory is not without its criticisms.
It provides a valuable framework for understanding how and why some people experience more intense emotions than others.
The experiment of the Schachter-Singer theory
In a well-known 1962 study, Stanley Schachter and Jerome Singer tested whether the same type of physiological arousal (getting an adrenaline shot) had different effects on people depending on their circumstances.
In the study, participants were given injections of either epinephrine (a hormone that increases heart rate and blood pressure) or a placebo.
The participants were not told which injection they had received. The researchers then placed the participants in one of two groups.
In one group, the participants were informed that the injection would make them feel more aroused and excited.
In the other group, the participants were told that the injection would not affect their emotions.
The researchers found that both groups of participants reported feeling more aroused after receiving the injection. But, only those in the group who were informed that the injection would make them more aroused also reported feeling more happy and excited.
This finding supports the Schachter-Singer Theory and suggests that cognitive labeling plays a role in emotional experience.
Misattribution of Arousal in Two Factor Theory
The misattribution of arousal study was conducted to test Schachter and Singer’s two-factor theory of emotion.
In this theory, it is proposed that emotions are the result of both physiological arousal and cognitive labeling. In other words, we first experience arousal (e.g., our heart rate increasing). Then we attribute that arousal to a particular emotion (e.g., feeling scared because our heart is beating faster).
In the study, male participants were asked to walk across two different bridges. The first bridge was a terrifying suspension bridge, which was narrow and suspended above a deep ravine.
The second bridge was much safer and more stable than the first. After crossing each bridge, the participants were asked to rate their level of arousal on a scale from 1-9.
The study’s results showed that the participants who crossed the suspension bridge rated their arousal level higher than those who crossed the safe bridge. However, when asked to label their emotions, both groups reported feeling equally scared.
This suggests that it is possible to misattribute arousal and that Schachter and Singer’s two-factor theory of emotion is correct.
Criticism of Schachter-Singer theory
Schachter-Singer or Two-Factor Theory of Emotion theory has been criticized because it does not consider individual differences in how people label their emotions.
The theory provides a framework for understanding how physiological arousal. Also, cognitive factors interact to produce emotional experiences.
The theory has inspired research on topics such as emotional regulation. And the role of cognition in emotion. As a result, the Schachter-Singer Theory has significantly impacted our understanding of emotion.
But, the theory does not explain why some people may experience extreme or intense emotions even when they do not have high levels of physiological arousal. Despite these limitations, the Schachter-Singer Theory is a valuable contribution to our understanding of emotion.
Schachter-Singer Theory: Extensions
The Schachter-Singer or two-factor theory has been extended to cover many emotions. In particular, the theory has been used to explain the experience of fear, happiness, and anger.
The theory can be applied in real-life situations by helping us to understand how emotions are experienced.
For example, suppose you see a snake in your path. In that case, you may experience fear because your brain labels the situation as dangerous, and you experience a physiological response such as an increased heart rate.
By understanding the Schachter-Singer Theory. We can better understand how our emotions and why the way we do in certain situations. Additionally, the theory can help us comprehend how to label our feelings also how cognitive factors play a role in emotional experience.
Schachter-Singer Theory: Limitations
The Schachter-Singer theory states that physiological activation from one source can transfer to the next thing we encounter. And this can affect our judgment of the new thing.
In other words, our physiological state can influence how about something.
For example, if we are already feeling physiological arousal from exercise, we may be more likely to experience positive emotions in response to something else. This is because physiological arousal will “prime” us for positive emotions.
If we feel physiological arousal from anxiety or stress, we may be more likely to experience negative emotions in response to something else. This is because physiological arousal will “prime” us for negative emotions.
3 Other Experiments
1. Schachter and Wheeler
Schachter and Wheeler’s study investigated the effects of different drugs on participants’ perceptions of a comedy film. Before watching the film, participants were given either epinephrine, chlorpromazine, or a placebo.
Epinephrine is a stimulant while chlorpromazine is a tranquilizer; in small doses, it causes drowsiness and numbness.
After the film, participants were asked to rate its comedic value. The results showed that those who had been given epinephrine rated the film as funnier than those who had been given chlorpromazine or a placebo.
This suggests that Schachter and Wheeler’s hypothesis was correct: that epinephrine would increase the perceived funniness of the film.
2. Marshall and Zimbardo
Marshall and Zimbardo’s attempt to recreate the phenomenon identified by Schachter and Singer entailed administering either epinephrine or a placebo, without any explanation of potential side effects, to participants shortly before exposure to either a neutral or euphoric confederate.
The hypothesis was that participants who had received epinephrine before exposure to a euphoric confederate would attribute their physiological determinants to the confederate instead of the drug.
Deviating from the original experiment, Marshall and Zimbardo determined the number of drugs given to participants based on their body weight.
It is important to note that there are limitations to their study. For example, the lack of explanation given to participants about potential drug side effects could have resulted in anxiety that influenced the results.
Additionally, because Marshall and Zimbardo did not use a double-blind design, it is possible that the expectations of the researchers influenced the results. Despite these limitations, Marshall and Zimbardo’s experiment provides valuable insight into how we interpret psychological arousal.
3. Maslach
In 1979, Maslach conducted a study using hypnosis to induce physiological arousal about specific cues.
The study consisted of a control group and a hypnosis group. The hypnosis group was exposed to a confederate who presented either euphoric or angry behavior. The control group was not given any specific instructions.
After the exposure, both groups were asked to rate the emotions of the three confederates.
The results showed that the participants in the hypnosis group were more likely to rate the emotions of the confederates as being influenced by their immediate environment. These findings suggest that hypnosis can induce physiological arousal about specific cues.
Example of Schachter-Singer’s Theory
The Schachter-Singer theory is a cognitive-behavioral model that states that our emotions are shaped by both our physical arousal and our cognitive label for that arousal.
In other words, the way is determined by how we interpret the physical sensations we are experiencing. This theory was first proposed in the 1960s by Stanley Schachter and Jerome Singer, and it has been used to explain a wide range of emotions, including fear, happiness, and anger.
The theory can be applied to real-life situations by helping us understand how emotions are experienced.
For example, imagine you are at a party, and you see a girl across the room who is very attractive. As a result, your heart rate increases, and you start to feel butterflies in your stomach. According to Schachter-Singer’s theory, this physiological arousal is labeled excitement because of the context.
If you were alone in a dark alley, this same physiological arousal would likely be labeled as fear. The Schachter-Singer Theory provides a framework for understanding how our emotions are shaped by both physiology and cognition.
Related: Arousal Theory of Motivation
Conclusion
The two-factor theory of emotion is a well-known and accepted model of how emotions are generated. It has been supported by research from many different angles, and it can be used to help us understand why people feel the way they do in certain situations.
But, other experiments on emotion may offer more insights into this complex topic. These experiments should not be discounted but studied further to see if they could provide more value in our understanding of human emotions.
FAQ
What is a cognitive label?
A cognitive label is a term used to describe a specific cognitive process or physiological response. For example, the term “hungry” is a cognitive label used to describe the sensation of needing food. Cognitive labels can help concisely explain complex phenomena.
Cognitive processes are often used to help simplify the experience of complex emotions or experiences. In addition, they can provide a way to understand and communicate our thoughts and feelings more.
Additionally, labeling can have a physiological effect on the body. When we give something a name, it helps us to separate it from everything else mentally. This separation allows us to focus our attention on the thing that we’ve named and enable us to respond more to it.
What are labels in psychology?
Labels are a type of psychological review that can help people make sense of their physical arousal. They are mental shortcuts that provide a way to simplify and understand complex situations or feelings.
When people experience solid physical arousal, making sense of what’s happening can be challenging. The mind races, and emotions become overwhelming. In these moments, labels can help give people a way to understand their experiences.
For example, if someone is feeling anxious in a social situation, they might label that feeling as “social anxiety.” This provides a simple explanation for what’s happening and helps the person to better understand and cope with the emotion.
What is arousal in emotion?
Arousal is a general term to describe the nervous system’s activation in response to stimuli. It can refer to both psychological and physical arousal.
When excited or passionate about something, our body responds with increased heart rate, respiration, and blood flow. This heightened awareness can help us perform better and be more alert.
Both psychological and physical arousal can be beneficial or detrimental depending on the
What is the James-Lange theory of arousal?
The James-Lange theory of arousal is the idea that emotions are the result of changes. William James and Carl Lange, two scientists who studied physiology, came up with this theory in the late 1800s.
The theory goes like this: let’s say you’re about to give a speech. According to the James-Lange theory, you’re nervous, your heart races, and your palms sweat. These changes cause your Emotions—in this case, anxiety.
Though the idea seems simple enough, there was (and still is) a lot of debate.
What is an example of James-Lange theory?
One example of the James-Lange theory is negative emotional biasing. The theory posits that the experience of emotion leads to the sensations that are associated with that emotion.
For example, when a person sees a frightening animal. They might feel their heart racing and their skin crawling, which would then cause them to feel afraid.
The James-Lange theory has been criticized because it does not consider cognitive factors such as expectations and interpretations.
Additionally, there is evidence that the body can produce feelings without accompanying emotions (as in the case of certain pain sensations). But, the theory continues to have some support among researchers.
